Calling Out the Mayor
-
Response to McEachron's Criticism
-
SCLA development hinged on Chinese investors
-
Committee spends $150,000 on incumbents
-
Victorville Credit Ratings Suspended
-
Portion of SCLA could go to Stirling for bargain price
-
Rothschild reverse vote to add deputies
-
Rothschild wont run for reelection
-
Rothschild back in City Council race
-
Cabriales, Rothschild, Kennedy targeted for recall
-
FPPC eyes Cabriales
Response to McEachron's Criticism

A Matter of fact

 

So, in his response letter to my criticism, Mayor McEachron admonishes the readers

to be careful of those who do not live in the city trying to control the city council. 

What the mayor failed to say is that as a result of personal requests, I spent

$150,000 in his 2008 campaign to defeat the Caldwell regime.  Also not said, was

the fact that every council member except Ms. Valles has accepted large sums of

funds from mostly outside sources, primarily through the influence of Buck Johns.   

So the question begs to be asked; If I have no contracts or business with the city,

and Buck Johns does, why would not the same rules that the Mayor is espousing

not apply equally to Buck Johns, Stirling and the city attorney Debortnowski?

Secondly, much of the monies being squandered by the city council happen to be at

SCLA which is situated in the VVEDA and RDA belonging to the entire high desert. 

So therefore, any monies or developments at SCLA most certainly affect the entire

desert.

Thirdly, it is widely recognized that the city of Victorville is the window of the Victor

Valley as a whole. What happens in Victorville affects the entire region.  So, in this

regard, any resident in the Victor Valley most certainly has a vested interest in the

mismanagement and wrong doings by and in the city of Victorville.

Mayor McEachron personally introduced me to Ms. Valles with the hopes that I

would offer her the same financial support to get elected so that he could  have a

collaborating force to assist him with his agenda and objectives.  None of my

positions when supporting McEachron have changed since supporting him.  Ms.

Valles has not modified her views and positions either.  Therefore, suffice it to say,

that as McEachron solicited my help,  based upon the foundations of his then

positions, I have every right as well as an obligation to voice my disapproval with

his actions and inactions that are contrary to his obvious new philosophies.

 

W Daniel Tate

Phelan, Ca

760-964-4976


HomeMissionLetters from the EditorSupporting FactsEvents & BlogTerry CaldwellAbout UsSupportGuestbook